{
  "url": "aeoptimizer.com/faq/i-ve-already-been-burned-by-one-ai-optimization-vendor-how-should-i-evaluate-or",
  "name": "I’ve already been burned by one “AI optimization” vendor—how should I evaluate or work with multiple providers now?",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "speakable": {
    "@type": "SpeakableSpecification",
    "cssSelector": [
      "h1",
      ".faq-question",
      ".faq-answer",
      "[itemprop=\"acceptedAnswer\"]"
    ]
  },
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "name": "I’ve already been burned by one “AI optimization” vendor—how should I evaluate or work with multiple providers now?",
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "text": "When you’ve had a bad experience, treat multi-vendor AI optimization as a **testable process with clear success criteria**, not a vague promise.\n\nYou want partners who show how they structure content, measure AI visibility, and handle disagreements between platforms.\n\nKey factors:\n- Transparent playbook for content patterns, schema, and testing\n- Examples of before/after AI answer presence for past clients\n- Clear scope: which pages, prompts, and metrics they’ll own\n- Willingness to collaborate with your internal team and tools\n\nStart with a small, well-defined pilot and insist on regular reporting that shows changes in AI citations and answer quality.\n\nUse that evidence to decide whether to deepen the relationship or pivot to another approach.",
        "@type": "Answer",
        "description": "Insist on a clear, testable playbook: which prompts they’ll target, how they’ll structure content, what schema they’ll add, and how they’ll measure AI citations. Start with a small pilot, review before/after answers, and expand only if the vendor’s process and results are transparent and repeatable."
      }
    }
  ],
  "description": "Insist on a clear, testable playbook: which prompts they’ll target, how they’ll structure content, what schema they’ll add, and how they’ll measure AI citations"
}